BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 11

Watch this video on: https://youtu.be/BUhAxML-AXg
https://rumble.com/v7gkhi2-heretic11.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/c0i4RlB1B689/
https://crowdbunker.com/v/75Z6BG4uKM

Bergoglio’s statement on Fiducia Supplicans dated January 14, 2024

On January 14, 2024, for the first time, Bergoglio commented in the media on the controversial document Fiducia Supplicans. However, he did not address the essence of the problem. His declaration contradicts the very essence of the Holy Scripture and the whole Tradition. His teaching is not Catholic. This is no longer the Catholic Church.

The Apostle John writes: “He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son.” (1Jn 2:22) By abrogating God’s Decalogue, Bergoglio denied the Father – the Lawgiver – and by abrogating Christ’s commandments, he denied the Son of God and His Gospel. He did not budge a millimeter on his apostasy.

Bergoglio said regarding Fiducia Supplicans: “People have to enter into a dialogue with the blessing and see the path that the Lord proposes.”

Everyone knows that Fiducia Supplicans introduces the blessing of sodomite unions, i.e. the blessing of the sin of sodomy. However, the pseudo Pope claimed that it was the Lord who proposed this path to destruction. This is a blatant lie. On the contrary, God proposes the path to salvation through the keeping of His commandments. Bergoglio revealed that he had another lord.

Francis commented on the controversy following the release of Fiducia Supplicans: “Sometimes decisions are not accepted. But in most cases when decisions are not accepted, it is because they are not understood.”

Did Bergoglio mean that bishops who defend God’s commandments and Catholic teaching do so because they do not understand? Bergoglio put himself in a position where his heretical understanding is presented as superior to the Scriptures, Tradition of the Apostles, Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church.

The Bishops of Cameroon, on the other hand, presented the Catholic position by their declaration on the inadmissibility of the blessing of sodomy, stating unanimously: “Literally, ‘to bless’ is ‘to speak well of’. And ‘to speak well of’ in order to gain grace through the gesture of blessing a ‘homosexual couple’ would be tantamount to encouraging a choice and a practice of life that cannot be recognized as being objectively ordered to the revealed designs of God. What is more, differentiating between liturgical and non-liturgical contexts in order to apply the blessing to same sex ‘couples’ is hypocritical. The act of blessing, whether performed in a liturgical assembly or in private, remains a blessing. We therefore declare non-compliant any form of blessing, public or private, that tends to recognize ‘same sex couples’ as a state of life.” (para. 6)

The pseudo Pope considered the Bishops of Cameroon to be jumping to ugly conclusions. However, they acted clearly in agreement with the Scriptures and the whole of Tradition: “The profound identity of sexuality is misunderstood, hijacked and perverted outside the conjugal relationship between man and woman. Consequently, homosexual acts are not ‘sexual’, but ‘acts against nature’ (Rom 1:26).” (para. 3)

The Cameroonian bishops forbade blessing these crimes against nature, and they did so in conformity with the Scriptures and Tradition. What Bergoglio promoted contrary to the Scriptures and Tradition is a blatant mockery of Christ’s teachings and of the Catholic Church.

The Bishops of Cameroon stated: “Since God does not want the death of the sinner, but his/her conversion to eternal life, we recommend those who are inclined to homosexuality… their radical conversion. We also invite them to turn away from their mentality of victimization in which they take pleasure in considering themselves as ‘victims’, ‘weak’, and ‘minorities’; in order to seize the opportunity for conversion that God gives them in the many exhortations of His Word.” (para. 9)

In 2021, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a declaration that the Church cannot bless the sin of sodomy. However, pseudo Pope Francis authoritatively decreed the blessing of sodomy in Fiducia Supplicans. It is quite obvious that the continuity of the teachings of the Catholic faith was interrupted by this shift.

The question keeps coming up: Was Pope Francis a manifest heretic, or was he not? All the evidence points to the fact that he was.

Download: BCP: Was Pope Francis a public heretic or not? Part 11