BCP: Auxiliary bishop Schneider undermines the Church in radice
Watch this video on: https://rumble.com/v1a0deh-bishop-schneider.html
https://cos.tv/videos/play/37151798929429504
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WnDdOSueQjPX/
Quote by Schneider: “The safest guiding principle in the crucial question for the life of the Church regarding the validity of the papacy of Pope Francis should be the prevailing practice in the history of the Church.”
Response: The safest guiding principle in the crucial question for the life of the Church regarding the validity of the papacy of Pope Francis is the fact of his public idolatry and specific heretical gestures and statements. They are proof that Bergoglio is a public idolater, heretic and promoter of sodomy. He has thus brought on himself God’s anathema or, in other words, has excluded himself from the Church. Therefore, he is an invalid Pope. In the history of the Church, for example, Pope Honorius was posthumously excommunicated for the heresies of Monotheletism.
Paul IV’s dogmatic bull Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio is also based on the prevailing practice in the history of the Church, stating that if the Pope becomes a heretic, he is expelled from the Church and everything he does is null and void. This unequivocally implies Bergoglio’s invalid papacy.
Quote by Schneider: “In recent months, arguments suggesting that the Pope is actually Benedict XVI, not Francis – motivated perhaps by the growing scandals emanating from the Vatican…”
Response: The growing scandals, which Bergoglio creates on a daily basis, literally result in the destruction of the healthy roots of the Church. These are multiplied proofs of Bergoglio’s invalid papacy. Instead of addressing this vital issue, Bishop Schneider addresses the misleading question of whether Benedict or Francis is the valid Pope. He manipulates the audience into believing an erroneous answer that Francis is a valid Pope.
The fact that the Vatican has become a de facto centre of the anti-Christian Masonic movement is referred to by Schneider simply as the growing scandals. The Masons arrive one after the other to the Vatican and organize their so-called conferences on climate, ecology or transhumanism resulting in depopulation and destruction of Christianity, especially from within.
Quote by Schneider: “…the dismissal from the papal office must be subordinated to the greater good of the whole Church, which in this case is the real existence of the visible head of the Church…”
Response: This is the height of Schneider’s manipulation. He appeals to the greater good of the whole Church, but this greater good, in his view, is by no means orthodox doctrine ensuring the salvation of souls. This greater good, in his view, is the real existence of the visible head. But Schneider doesn’t care if the visible head is a heretic, an idolater, or a pro-sodomy propagandist who brings curse both on himself and the Church.
He doesn’t even care that this head has been cut off from the body through heresies. By promoting a heretic on the papal throne, Schneider endorses all of Bergoglio’s heresies as a new teaching. He thus confirms the transition of the Church to the anti-Church of the New Age. Following Schneider’s principle, even an open satanist can be a pope; the main thing is to have the visible head, no matter whether he drags Catholics to hell. This is said to be the greater good of the Church.
Quote by Schneider: “… the vital activity of the universal Church depends on its visible head …”
Response: Schneider is right about that. Today, Bergoglio is vitally active in promoting the Islamization of Christian nations, satanic anti-baptism with the mRNA vaccine, sodomy, blessing of sodomite marriages in churches (Germany is an example), Masonic depopulation or extermination agenda, public idolatry with the Pachamama demon, ecological conversion to Amazonian territorial demons, and so on. This vital activity, however, results in the destruction of the Church and the damnation of souls.
Quote by Schneider: “The spiritual good of the faithful depends on a valid appointment of a bishop, which in turn relies upon a valid and clearly visible Pope.”
Response: Bergoglio, however, is a visibly invalid Pope who appoints invalid bishops and cardinals, thus opposing the spiritual good of the faithful. Nevertheless, Schneider is pushing for this invalid Pope. Schneider does more harm to the Church than the apparent supporters of the heretic Bergoglio. He uses orthodox Catholic terminology to destroy Catholic orthodoxy.
Quote by Schneider: “Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not fall under this category of undermining the Church.”
Response: Bishop Schneider gives the impression that he is supporting the traditional movement of Archbishop Lefebvre. We ask: Why does Bishop Schneider not publicly call on Francis to lift the ban that he has put on traditional Mass? If he is a supporter of Archbishop Lefebvre, why does he not ask Francis to rehabilitate this true Catholic archbishop? By the category of undermining the Church, Schneider means the case when a heretic is called a heretic.
On the other hand, when a heretic undermines the Church at the root (in radice), Schneider calls it the greater good of the Church because it is done by the visible head. He does not take account of the fact that this so-called visible head has already dug his way out of the Church. Schneider forces true Catholics to stick to the expelled head at all costs and thus find themselves outside the Church as well.
Quote by Schneider: “(Abp Lefebvre) always mentioned the Pope in the Canon of the Mass.”
Response: Schneider says assertively that Abp Lefebvre always mentioned the Pope in the Canon of the Mass. By saying so, he manipulates the priests of the Society of Pius X into mentioning the heretic Bergoglio in the Mass. Their Masses will thus become sub dubio, and they will bring on themselves and the faithful the darkness of curse. But Schneider won’t tell them that, of course. It is a paradox that Schneider is the centre of all attention at all traditionalist meetings, especially in the United States, although he is de facto destroying the spiritual heritage of Abp Lefebvre.
Quote by Schneider: “Guided ultimately by the spiritual good and eternal salvation of the faithful, the Church supplies the principle of sanatio in radice (healing at the root).”
Response: Schneider is not guided by the spiritual good and eternal salvation of the faithful if he defends a heretic as the head of the Church. By legalizing his heresies, Bergoglio is poisoning the Church at the root. Healing according to the principle of sanatio in radice can no longer take place here. In contrast to Schneider, the former Nuncio to the United States, Carlo Maria Viganò, was truly guided by the spiritual good and eternal salvation of the faithful, and therefore he called on the heretic Francis and the entire homosexual network to resign.
This is a sine qua non condition! Otherwise, the Church cannot be healed in radice, that is, at the root, and cannot be restored. Schneider ostensibly fights heresies, but protects the greatest heretic. This is spiritual schizophrenia.
Healing in radice requires not only to call a heretic a heretic, but also to call sodomy a sin and abomination. Furthermore, it is necessary to call the Pachamama idolatry a crime against the First Commandment, where one abandons the true God and inclines to idols, i.e. demons. Schneider deliberately boycotts these Bergoglio’s crimes against God and the Church. He does not call them by their proper names. He covers them up in order to keep a heretic in office along with the entire heretical and homosexual network. By doing so, he prevents the Church from being restored at the root – in radice. Who does he serve?
+ Elijah
Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate
+ Methodius OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
Secretary Bishops
19 June 2022
Download: BCP: Auxiliary bishop Schneider undermines the Church in radice (19/6/2022)